A Jurassic Park prequel idea makes more sense than any reboot

Summary

• A Jurassic Park prequel is overdue, exploring the origins of the dinosaur theme park.

• The prequel could address unanswered questions like the sudden introduction of Isla Sorna.

• Rethinking Jurassic as a horror series would offer new perspectives on the iconic characters.

Not every movie or franchise needs a prequel, but Jurassic Park deserves one without a doubt. With three movies each in Jurassic Park and Jurassic World series, the franchise has no shortage of sequels and soft reboots. But he still hasn't dared to explore the origin story of the dinosaur theme park.

Based on Michael Crichton's novels, each film based on Steven Spielberg's original Jurassic Park it was a simple sequel set after the events of the previous film. In some of these sequels, such as The lost world and The Fallen Kingdomnew elements expanded on the backstory that was only briefly touched upon in the first film and the books.

Do what Jurassic Park Need a prequel?

Why an origin story would work

It's about time there was a prequel movie or TV series about the events before Jurassic Park. The prequel should be set during the development or construction of the original park. The original 1993 film began at a time when the park's opening was imminent. While it explained almost every technical aspect of how the place came to life, it didn't show the audience how it happened or what it might have covered beneath the surface.

And that's not a bad thing. In fact, Spielberg's use of “show-don't-story” benefited the film and saved the audience from exposition or over-explanation of the plot. However, as it is, recently Jurassic World rate as The Fallen Kingdom and Dominion it almost feels like they ran out of enough story to cover in the current timeline. Going back to the beginning could be a refreshing change for the franchise. (That is, of course, unless Alex Garland proves us wrong next Renaissance film.)

The story for a potential Jurassic Prequel

Site B, InGen & Hammond

A potential Jurassic Park the prequel movie or TV series could explore many ideas detailed in Michael Crichton's novels, such as the introduction of Site B or people helping InGen clone dinosaurs. Details like these weren't mentioned in the first film, but over time, they've been sprinkled in further, giving audiences a deeper understanding of how John Hammond brought his vision to life “with no expense spared.” .

Essentially, the prequel would cover the beginnings of InGen and how they managed to clone dinosaur DNA. It would detail the establishment of places like Isla Nublar, Site B, and Jurassic Park San Diego. While Benjamin Lockwood was introduced much later in the The Fallen Kingdom and Dominionthe public could finally get an idea of ​​exactly why it had a consequence with Hammond before the first park opened.

What led to the creation of Jurassic Park?

A Jurassic Park 0 Before the Next Continuation

The main argument in favor of a Jurassic Park or Jurassic World prequel is that it would take the time to explore elements from the books that were either condensed or omitted altogether. The prequel could also explore the first discovery that led to the rest of the story, as shared by Crichton in a presentation for The Lost World: Jurassic Park. This would mostly work as a series as it could lay a solid foundation for the franchise to continue further.

What happened was that I had made a screenplay about a young graduate who genetically modified a single dinosaur from fossil remains. And the script didn't work. It was an event too fantastic to be kept secret, which happened in that story.

For example, when The lost world appeared in 1997, the introduction of the island of Sorna was criticized because the concept of a second island was suddenly felt. It was introduced too abruptly with no mention of what happened to Isla Nublar in the first film. A prequel could address such gaps and provide a stronger narrative foundation upon which other films can be built. It would also address some unanswered questions and perhaps provide a new perspective on some iconic characters.

The main characters for a Jurassic Park prequel

Darker shades, different perspectives

John Hammond appears as a jovial, grandfatherly character in the movies, but in the books, there's no doubt that he's the villain. A prequel could shed light on his darker side and show how he's covered up more deaths than the few we know about. Moreover, it would ideally include all the characters that are around to build the original Jurassic Park. It includes Hammond, Henry Wu, Benjamin Lockwood and guard Robert Muldoon.

More horror, less adventure

A possible one Jurassic Park the prequel needs to feel less like an adventure movie and more like a horror or thriller. This could be done by showing incidents that led to certain decisions seen in the original films. For example, the electric fences built around the park are a simple security measure, but imagine if the prequel showed what led them to build it in the first place – perhaps with an upsetting incident.

Prequel series or complete TV reboot?

Jurassic Park: The Movie Vs. Book

In fact, it doesn't have to be just a prequel. There's also room for an entire series adaptation Jurassic Park movies, which would be more accurate to the book and cater to the fan base better. This could essentially work as a second adaptation while still maintaining a distinct flavor from the films. A suitable example would be how Dune it has been adapted in various instances as both movies and TV shows.

Jurassic Park it's no ordinary movie – it's cemented in pop culture. Most audiences across generations need no explanation of what happened in the previous films. Watching a moment like the first successful birth of a baby dinosaur or how the iconic gates on Isla Nublar were built wouldn't just be a Jurassic Park fan's dream come true. It also works without the need for complex configuration or context.